Implementing Cisco SD-WAN and Palo Alto Prisma SASE Together: A Real-World Implementation Guide

Written By Pat Allen

The Perfect Storm: Why SD-WAN + SASE Makes Sense

If you've been following my previous posts on SD-WAN fundamentals and SASE/SSE implementation strategies, you're aware that both technologies address critical gaps in traditional network architectures. But what happens when you need both?

For many mid-sized organizations, the reality is that SD-WAN and SASE aren't competing solutions – they're complementary technologies that, when implemented together, create a robust, scalable, and secure network foundation for the modern enterprise.

Let me walk you through a real-world scenario: implementing Cisco SD-WAN and Palo Alto Prisma SASE for a 75-office organization that needed to modernize its entire WAN and security infrastructure simultaneously. This framework applies to any vendor combo, I just selected Cisco SD-WAN and Palo Alto SASE because they’re a leader in their respective spaces

The Business Case: Why This Company Chose Both

The Starting Point

Our example organization is a regional healthcare chain with:

  • 75 locations across multiple states

  • Mix of large hospitals, small e-care, and back offices

  • Legacy MPLS network struggling with bandwidth limitations

  • Outdated firewall infrastructure at each location

  • Growing cloud adoption is creating security blind spots

  • Remote work requirements post-pandemic

  • Aggressive expansion plans requiring rapid site deployment

The Challenge: Solving Multiple Problems Simultaneously

Traditional approaches would tackle these challenges sequentially:

  1. First, replace the WAN infrastructure (SD-WAN)

  2. Then, modernize security (SASE)

  3. Finally, optimize for cloud and remote access

But this sequential approach creates problems:

  • Extended timelines with multiple vendor engagements

  • Temporary security gaps during transitions

  • Increased complexity in managing parallel projects

  • Higher costs from multiple infrastructure refreshes

The Solution: Integrated SD-WAN + SASE Deployment

By implementing Cisco SD-WAN and Palo Alto Prisma SASE together, this organization could:

  • Modernize WAN and security infrastructure simultaneously

  • Create consistent security policies across all locations

  • Enable secure direct cloud access from branches

  • Support remote workers with the same security posture

  • Reduce total project timeline and implementation costs

Architecture Overview: How They Work Together

The Integration Model

Cisco SD-WAN Foundation:

  • Centralized policy management through vManage

  • Dynamic path selection and traffic steering

  • Application-aware routing and QoS

  • Secure fabric connectivity between sites

Palo Alto Prisma SASE Layer:

  • Cloud-delivered security services

  • Secure web gateway and CASB functionality

  • Zero Trust Network Access for remote users

  • Consistent security policy enforcement

Key Integration Points

1. Traffic Steering Integration:

2. Policy Coordination:

  • SD-WAN handles path selection and WAN optimization

  • SASE provides security inspection and policy enforcement

  • Coordinated policies ensure traffic reaches both systems appropriately

3. Centralized Management:

  • vManage for SD-WAN orchestration

  • Prisma Access for SASE policy management

  • Integration APIs for coordinated policy deployment

Implementation Strategy: A Phased Approach

Phase 1: Foundation and Planning (Months 1-2)

Infrastructure Assessment:

  • Current WAN utilization and performance analysis

  • Security posture evaluation and gap analysis

  • Application flow mapping and criticality assessment

  • Bandwidth requirements and growth projections

Design and Architecture:

  • Hub site identification and design

  • Branch site categorization (large, medium, small)

  • Internet breakout strategy definition

  • Security policy framework development

Team Preparation:

  • Technical training on both platforms

  • Vendor partner engagement and support planning

  • Change management and communication planning

  • Pilot site selection and success criteria definition

Phase 2: Hub Sites and Pilot Implementation (Months 2-4)

Hub Site Deployment:

  • Install Cisco vEdge routers at data centers

  • Deploy vManage controllers and vSmart controllers

  • Configure SASE cloud gateways and policies

  • Establish a secure fabric between hubs

Pilot Branch Implementation:

  • Select 3-5 representative branch locations

  • Install vEdge devices with appropriate sizing

  • Configure Prisma Access client connections

  • Test application performance and security policies

Key Success Metrics:

  • Application response time improvements

  • Security policy enforcement validation

  • Failover and redundancy testing results

  • User experience feedback from pilot locations

Phase 3: Branch Rollout (Months 4-8)

Systematic Branch Deployment:

  • Tier 1 sites (largest/most critical): Months 4-5

  • Tier 2 sites (medium locations): Months 5-7

  • Tier 3 sites (smallest locations): Months 7-8

Per-Site Implementation Process:

  1. Pre-staging equipment configuration

  2. Coordinated installation during maintenance windows

  3. Parallel operations with legacy systems during testing

  4. Cutover and legacy system decommissioning

  5. Post-implementation optimization and tuning

Phase 4: Remote Access and Mobile Users (Months 6-8)

Prisma Access GlobalProtect Deployment:

  • Client software packaging and deployment

  • User authentication integration (Active Directory/SSO)

  • Mobile device management integration

  • Policy refinement based on user behavior analytics

Technical Implementation Details

Cisco SD-WAN Configuration Highlights

vManage Policy Configuration:

# Application-aware routing for cloud traffic
policy:
  application_routing:
    - name: "Office365_Direct"
      applications: ["office365", "teams", "sharepoint"]
      action: "direct_internet"
      sla_class: "realtime"
    
    - name: "Critical_Apps_MPLS"
      applications: ["erp", "pos_system"]
      action: "mpls_preferred"
      sla_class: "business_critical"

Traffic Steering for SASE Integration:

# Route specific traffic to SASE inspection
route_policy:
  - name: "SASE_Steering"
    match:
      - destination: "0.0.0.0/0"
      - protocol: ["http", "https"]
    action:
      - next_hop: "prisma_gateway"
      - backup_path: "direct_internet"

Palo Alto Prisma SASE Configuration

Security Policy Framework:

# Branch office security profile
security_rules:
  - name: "Branch_Internet_Access"
    source: ["branch_users"]
    destination: ["internet"]
    services: ["web_browsing", "ssl"]
    action: "allow"
    profiles:
      - threat_prevention: "strict"
      - url_filtering: "corporate_policy"
      - file_blocking: "standard"
      - data_filtering: "pci_compliance"

Zero Trust Access Policies:

# Remote access security policies
ztna_policies:
  - name: "Remote_App_Access"
    users: ["authenticated_users"]
    applications: ["internal_web_apps"]
    conditions:
      - device_compliance: "required"
      - multi_factor_auth: "required"
    access: "allow"

Integration Challenges and Solutions

Challenge 1: Traffic Flow Optimization

Problem: Ensuring traffic reaches both SD-WAN and SASE systems without creating performance bottlenecks or routing loops.

Solution: Implemented service chaining approach:

  • SD-WAN handles initial routing decisions

  • SASE provides security inspection for internet-bound traffic

  • Direct internal traffic bypasses SASE for performance

  • Application-specific routing policies optimize flow paths

Challenge 2: Policy Consistency

Problem: Maintaining consistent security policies across SD-WAN direct internet breakouts and SASE-inspected traffic.

Solution: Developed a unified policy framework:

  • Centralized policy definition in the security team

  • Automated policy translation for both platforms

  • Regular policy synchronization and compliance checking

  • Exception handling for performance-critical applications

Challenge 3: Operational Complexity

Problem: Managing two separate platforms with different management interfaces and operational procedures.

Solution: Created operational integration:

  • Cross-platform monitoring dashboards

  • Unified incident response procedures

  • Coordinated change management processes

  • Integrated reporting and analytics

Challenge 4: Performance Optimization

Problem: Balancing security inspection depth with application performance requirements.

Solution: Implemented tiered inspection approach:

  • Full SASE inspection for high-risk traffic

  • Lightweight inspection for trusted applications

  • Direct routing for performance-critical internal traffic

  • Dynamic policy adjustment based on performance metrics

Real-World Results and Lessons Learned

Quantifiable Improvements

Network Performance:

  • 40% improvement in application response times

  • 60% reduction in WAN costs through MPLS optimization

  • 99.9% uptime achievement across all locations

  • 50% faster new site deployment process

Security Posture:

  • 90% reduction in security incidents

  • 100% visibility into cloud application usage

  • Consistent policy enforcement across all locations

  • Comprehensive threat intelligence integration

Operational Efficiency:

  • 70% reduction in network management overhead

  • Centralized troubleshooting and monitoring

  • Automated policy deployment and compliance

  • Simplified vendor management relationships

Key Lessons Learned

1. Start with Strong Design Foundations. The success of the integration depended heavily on upfront architectural planning. Time invested in understanding traffic flows and application requirements paid dividends throughout implementation.

2. Pilot Testing is Critical. The pilot phase revealed integration issues that would have been costly to discover during full rollout. Testing both normal operations and failure scenarios was essential.

3. Team Training Makes the Difference Having team members trained on both platforms enabled faster troubleshooting and more efficient operations. Cross-platform expertise was more valuable than deep specialization in either technology alone.

4. Vendor Coordination is Essential. Regular coordination between Cisco and Palo Alto support teams prevented finger-pointing during issues and accelerated problem resolution.

Cost Considerations and ROI Analysis

Implementation Costs

NOTE: These are just round numbers for the sake of the example. Numbers will obviously vary depending on the environment.

Cisco SD-WAN Investment:

  • vEdge hardware for 75 locations: $450,000

  • Licensing and support (3 years): $275,000

  • Professional services and implementation: $150,000

  • Total SD-WAN Investment: $875,000

Palo Alto Prisma SASE Investment:

  • Cloud service licensing (3 years): $380,000

  • GlobalProtect licensing for 2,000 users: $120,000

  • Professional services and integration: $100,000

  • Total SASE Investment: $600,000

Combined Implementation: $1,475,000

Cost Savings and ROI

Annual Operational Savings:

  • MPLS cost reduction: $400,000/year

  • Reduced firewall hardware refresh: $150,000/year

  • Operational efficiency gains: $200,000/year

  • Total Annual Savings: $750,000

3-Year ROI Calculation:

  • Total savings over 3 years: $2,250,000

  • Net ROI: $775,000 (53% return on investment)

  • Payback period: 23 months

Best Practices for Similar Implementations

Technical Best Practices

1. Application Flow Mapping

  • Document all application flows before implementation

  • Identify performance-critical applications requiring special handling

  • Plan traffic steering policies to optimize both security and performance

2. Gradual Traffic Migration

  • Implement parallel operations during cutover

  • Use canary deployments for policy changes

  • Maintain rollback procedures for each phase

3. Monitoring Integration

  • Implement unified monitoring across both platforms

  • Create cross-platform correlation for troubleshooting

  • Establish performance baselines before and after implementation

Organizational Best Practices

1. Cross-Functional Team Formation

  • Include networking, security, and application teams in planning

  • Establish clear roles and responsibilities for each platform

  • Create escalation procedures for complex issues

2. Change Management

  • Communicate benefits and changes to end users

  • Provide training for help desk and support teams

  • Establish feedback mechanisms for continuous improvement

3. Vendor Relationship Management

  • Establish joint vendor support procedures

  • Regular vendor coordination meetings during implementation

  • Clear escalation paths for integration issues

Future Considerations and Evolution

Technology Roadmap Integration

Short-term Enhancements (6-12 months):

  • Advanced analytics integration between platforms

  • Automated policy optimization based on usage patterns

  • Enhanced zero-trust capabilities for internal applications

Medium-term Evolution (1-2 years):

  • AI-driven security policy optimization

  • Enhanced cloud integration and multi-cloud support

  • Advanced automation and orchestration capabilities

Long-term Strategy (2+ years):

  • Full SASE convergence as technologies mature

  • Edge computing integration for distributed applications

  • Advanced threat intelligence and behavioral analytics

Scalability Planning

The integrated architecture supports future growth through:

  • Cloud-native scaling for SASE services

  • Modular SD-WAN expansion for new locations

  • Consistent policy framework for diverse site types

  • Automated onboarding for rapid site deployment

Conclusion: The Power of Integrated Implementation

Implementing Cisco SD-WAN and Palo Alto Prisma SASE together created more value than either technology could deliver independently. The integration enabled this mid-sized organization to:

  • Modernize their entire network and security infrastructure simultaneously

  • Achieve better performance and security outcomes than sequential implementation

  • Reduce total project timeline and costs through coordinated deployment

  • Create a foundation for future growth and technology evolution

For organizations considering similar implementations, the key success factors are:

  1. Comprehensive upfront planning and design

  2. Strong vendor coordination and support

  3. Phased implementation with thorough testing

  4. Investment in team training and development

  5. Focus on operational integration, not just technical integration

The result is a modern, secure, and scalable network infrastructure that supports business growth while reducing operational complexity and costs.

Want to learn more about the individual technologies? Check out my previous posts on SD-WAN fundamentals and implementation strategies and SASE/SSE evaluation and deployment guidance for deeper dives into each technology area.

Considering a similar implementation in your organization? I'd love to hear about your experiences with SD-WAN and SASE integration. Connect with me on LinkedIn or drop a comment below to share your challenges, successes, and lessons learned!

Pat Allen
Next

From Network Engineer to Network Engineering Manager: A First-Timer's Guide