The Certification Paradox: Why It's Easier to Pass CCNA and Harder to Break Into Network Engineering
The Comment That Started This
I posted on LinkedIn about my certification journey - how it took me three attempts to pass CCNA between 2007 and 2012, and then two tries to pass the ROUTE exam for my CCNP in 2015. Just being honest about the struggle.
Someone responded with a comment that's been stuck in my head:
"Back in 2012, we didn't have the learning resources that we have available now. CBT Nuggets, Network Chuck, Jeremy's IT Lab, Udemy etc. We had Cisco Press and Packet Tracer... I'm currently preparing for the CCNA, but I'm caught in this middle ground where I can't make the leap just yet from Network Support to Network Engineer... Requirements weren't as broad or as in-depth 15-20 years ago as they are today. Certifications can help, but it doesn't guarantee anything."
This comment crystallized something I've been noticing:
The resources to learn networking are better than ever. Passing certifications is more achievable than ever. But breaking into actual network engineering roles is harder than it's been in 25 years.
There's a paradox here that's worth unpacking.
Because if you're stuck in a Network Support role with a CCNA wondering why you can't break into engineering, it's not because you're not working hard enough or because you're not qualified.
The system changed. And nobody's really talking about it.
Let me share what I've seen over 25 years in this industry, what's different now, and what it means for people trying to build networking careers today.
My Journey: When CCNA Actually Opened Doors
A bit of context about my background:
I've been in IT for almost 25 years, always been a network guy. Hyper-focused on Cisco and Cisco certifications especially early on. That focus has been the through-line of my career.
The CCNA Struggle (2007-2012)
First attempt: Failed. Not even close.
Second attempt: Failed. Closer, but still not there.
Third attempt (2012): Passed. Finally.
Five years. Three attempts. One certification.
What I had to work with:
Cisco Press books (dense, dry, comprehensive)
Packet Tracer (when it worked)
Maybe CBT Nuggets if you could afford the subscription
A few scattered forums
Trial and error in physical labs when I could get access
That was essentially it.
No YouTube tutorials, no Jeremy's IT Lab, no Network Chuck making networking concepts engaging and accessible. There were rockstars like Keith Barker and David Bomball, and Anthony Sequera, but generally, they were behind paywalls with big video training companies - at the time, we were all broke! No Discord communities where you could get help at 2 AM. No AI tutors to explain concepts differently when the book didn't make sense, and I still have scars about buying refurbished Cisco gear on eBay, only to get it, and it didn’t boot or had a previous config on it, and I couldn’t wipe it.
Learning was harder. Resources were limited. Passing was genuinely difficult.
What Happened After I Passed
Within 6 months of getting my CCNA, I had better job opportunities.
Not amazing opportunities - I wasn't suddenly a senior engineer, but real network engineering work, projects, design exposure, and learning from experienced engineers.
The CCNA was a signal:
"This person is serious about networking. They learned the fundamentals. They can probably handle junior engineering work."
It opened doors.
The CCNP Journey (2015)
When CCNP consisted of three separate exams: ROUTE, SWITCH, and TSHOOT.
SWITCH: Passed first attempt.
TSHOOT: Passed first attempt.
ROUTE: Failed first attempt. Passed the second attempt.
When I got CCNP, the doors didn't just open - they blew wide open.
Opportunities I couldn't have gotten without it. Respect from senior engineers, consideration for roles I wouldn't have been interviewed for.
CCNP meant something significant in 2015.
It meant you understood routing and switching at depth. You could design networks, you could troubleshoot complex issues, you were a legitimate network engineer, not just someone who could configure basic connectivity.
That certification changed my career trajectory.
What's Different Today: The Resource Explosion
Fast forward to 2026.
If I were starting today, preparing for CCNA, my experience would be completely different:
The Learning Resources Available Now
Video Training:
CBT Nuggets (polished, comprehensive)
INE.com (I personally use this today for certs)
Jeremy's IT Lab (free, excellent, focused on CCNA)
Network Chuck (engaging, makes concepts click)
Countless YouTube channels
Udemy courses for $15
Lab Options:
EVE-NG (full network simulation, free)
GNS3 (industry standard, free)
CML Personal (Cisco's official platform, affordable)
Packet Tracer (much better than the 2007 version)
Cloud-based labs (no hardware needed)
Community Support:
Reddit communities (r/ccna, r/networking)
Discord servers dedicated to CCNA prep
Study groups
Active forums - Shoutout to my guy, The Bearded IT Dad, for his IT Career Accelerator Program
Real-time help available
Study Tools:
Anki flashcard decks
Practice exam platforms
Lab workbooks
Study plans and roadmaps
NotebookLM
AI tutors that can explain concepts differently
The comparison isn't even close.
Someone preparing for CCNA today has resources I couldn't have imagined in 2007.
The Result: More People Passing, Passing Faster
This is genuinely good.
Better resources mean:
More people can learn networking
Learning is more accessible
Passing doesn't require multiple attempts
People master the material more efficiently
The barrier to entry for networking knowledge has dropped significantly.
Someone can go from zero networking knowledge to passing CCNA in 3-6 months with focused study and these resources.
When I started, that timeline was 1-2 years minimum for most people.
This democratization of knowledge is progress.
But it's created an unintended consequence that's breaking the career path into a networking-only path.
The changing landscape of network engineering education and career paths connects to The Talent Pipeline AI Is Destroying - multiple forces are reshaping how people enter this field.
The Paradox: Easier to Learn, Harder to Break In
Here's the paradox that the LinkedIn comment captured:
2012 (My Experience):
Learning:
Limited resources
Genuinely difficult to prepare
Often required multiple attempts
Took years to pass
Job Market:
CCNA was a meaningful differentiator
Passing CCNA = you're serious about networking
Could get junior network engineer roles with CCNA + some support experience
Clear progression: Support → Junior Engineer → Engineer → Senior
Result: Harder to learn, easier to break in
2026 (Today's Reality):
Learning:
Abundant resources
Much easier to prepare effectively
Many pass the first attempt
Can study and pass in months
Job Market:
CCNA is baseline expectation
Everyone has CCNA (or can get it relatively easily)
Can't get junior engineer roles with just CCNA
Broken progression: Support roles being eliminated, entry-level roles require years of experience
Result: Easier to learn, harder to break in
This is the certification paradox.
When Everyone Has CCNA, Nobody Has CCNA
The fundamental problem:
When learning resources make certification more accessible, more people get certified. When more people are certified, the certification becomes less of a differentiator.
It's basic supply and demand applied to credentials.
The Job Posting Evolution
2012 job posting:
"Junior Network Engineer"
Requirements: CCNA, 1-2 years experience in IT/networking
Responsibilities: Implement configurations, troubleshoot issues, assist senior engineers
Will train on advanced topics
Typical applicant pool: 20 people, maybe 5 with CCNA
CCNA made you stand out.
2026 job posting:
"Network Engineer" (they don't call it junior anymore)
Requirements:
CCNA required (minimum)
CCNP or equivalent preferred
3-5 years hands-on experience
Python/Ansible automation experience
Cloud networking (AWS/Azure)
SD-WAN experience
Familiarity with containerization
Responsibilities: Independent design and implementation, automation, troubleshooting complex issues
Typical applicant pool: 200 people, 150 with CCNA
CCNA doesn't differentiate anyone.
The Inflation Effect
This is credential inflation, exactly like degree inflation:
1970s: High school diploma → middle-class job
1990s: Bachelor's degree → middle-class job
2010s: Bachelor's + internships + skills → middle-class job
2020s: Bachelor's + experience + certifications + demonstrated skills + network → entry to middle-class job
Each generation needs more credentials to reach the same starting point.
For networking:
2005: CCNA → Junior engineer role
2015: CCNA + 2 years support → Junior engineer role
2026: CCNA + CCNP + automation skills + cloud experience + 3-5 years → Engineer role (not even junior)
The bar keeps rising.
Why This Is Happening
It's not malicious. It's market forces:
Supply side:
Better resources = more people certified
Online learning = more accessible
Bootcamps producing CCNA holders
Career changers entering networking
More certified applicants per job
Demand side:
Fewer general "network engineer" jobs
More specialized roles (cloud, automation, SD-WAN)
Companies want specialized skills, not just fundamentals
Outsourcing of general networking work
AI/automation reducing need for entry-level work
Result:
Employers can ask for more because supply of certified candidates exceeds available positions.
When you have 150 CCNA holders applying for one job, you add more requirements to filter them.
CCNA becomes the minimum to be considered, not the qualification that gets you the job.
The Experience Paradox: Entry-Level Jobs Require Experience
Here's the cruel irony:
Job posting: "Junior Network Engineer"
Requirements: 3-5 years experience
Wait, what?
The Impossible Catch-22
To get network engineering experience, you need a network engineering job.
To get a network engineering job, you need network engineering experience.
How do you break in?
The old answer: Start in Network Support / NOC, learn on the job, transition to engineering after 1-2 years.
The new problem: That path is breaking down.
Why Network Support Doesn't Lead to Network Engineer Anymore
What Network Support used to be:
The good version (2005-2015):
Exposure to wide range of network issues
Hands-on troubleshooting with guidance from engineers
Learning by doing (shadowing engineers, assisting on projects)
Mentorship from senior engineers on the team
Natural progression: demonstrate competence → promoted to junior engineer
This was the entry ramp to networking careers.
What Network Support is today:
The reality (2020-2026):
Highly scripted, following runbooks
Limited actual troubleshooting (escalate anything complex)
Outsourced to MSPs or offshore teams
Being replaced by AI (see: my previous posts on AI destroying the talent pipeline)
Dead-end role with no progression path
Remaining support roles are more like call center work than network engineering
The skills you develop in support today don't translate to engineering work.
And employers know this:
"Network Support experience" ≠ "Network Engineering experience"
Even 5 years in support doesn't count as "3-5 years network engineering experience" on job postings.
You're stuck.
The Alternative Paths Have Closed Too
Used to work:
MSP path: Work at managed service provider, get exposure to many environments, transition to enterprise network engineer
Now: MSPs are also automating, outsourcing, and specializing. Entry-level roles there are disappearing too.
Internal transfer: Get hired in IT support, transfer to networking internally
Now: Companies have separate support orgs (often outsourced). Internal transfers are rare.
Contractor path: Contract roles to build experience
Now: Contract roles want experienced people too. They don't take chances on entry-level.
The paths that used to work are narrowing or closing.
The Market Shift: From Generalist to Specialist
There's a deeper market shift happening that's changing what "network engineer" means:
The 2012 Job Market
Typical network engineer role:
Routing and switching (Cisco, maybe Juniper)
Some firewall work
VPN implementation
General infrastructure troubleshooting
Design and implementation of enterprise networks
Skills needed:
Deep understanding of routing protocols
Switch configuration and VLANs
WAN technologies
Basic security concepts
CCNA taught these fundamentals. CCNP demonstrated mastery.
There were lots of these generalist roles.
Every enterprise needed network engineers. Hospitals, universities, manufacturers, retailers, financial services - all had internal network teams doing similar work.
The 2026 Job Market
"Network Engineer" has fragmented into specialties:
Cloud Network Engineer:
AWS/Azure/GCP networking
Software-defined networking in cloud
Hybrid cloud connectivity
Infrastructure as Code
Different from traditional networking
Network Automation Engineer:
Python scripting
Ansible/Terraform
CI/CD pipelines for network configs
Git version control
More software engineering than traditional networking
SD-WAN Engineer:
Specific vendor platforms (Viptela, Meraki, VeloCloud)
Cloud-managed networking
Application-aware routing
Different paradigm from traditional WAN
Data Center Network Engineer:
Spine-leaf architectures
EVPN-VXLAN
Overlay networking
Automation at scale
Specialized, not general enterprise networking
Security Network Engineer:
Firewall architecture
Zero trust networking
Micro-segmentation
Security + networking hybrid
Fewer general "network engineer" roles. More specialized positions requiring specific tech stacks.
What This Means for CCNA
CCNA teaches traditional networking fundamentals:
Routing protocols (OSPF, EIGRP, BGP basics)
Switching and VLANs
Traditional WAN technologies
IPv4/IPv6
Network services (DHCP, DNS, NAT)
These fundamentals still matter. You need them for any networking specialty.
But CCNA alone doesn't prepare you for:
Cloud networking (different abstractions)
Network automation (programming required)
SD-WAN (vendor-specific, cloud-managed)
Modern data center (overlay technologies, automation)
CCNA is necessary foundation but not sufficient for specialized roles.
The market shifted from "we need network engineers who know routing and switching" to "we need cloud network engineers who know routing/switching AND AWS networking AND Terraform AND Python."
CCNA became table stakes, not the full qualification.
The Network Support Trap: Stuck in the Middle
This is where the LinkedIn comment hit hardest:
"I'm caught in this middle ground where I can't make the leap just yet from Network Support to Network Engineer."
This is incredibly common and frustrating, and often not about the individual's capability.
The Trap Mechanics
You're in Network Support. You:
Have your CCNA (or working toward it)
Understand networking fundamentals
Want to do actual network engineering work
Can't get a network engineer job
Why you can't break out:
Reason 1: Support experience doesn't count
Job postings want "network engineering experience." Your support work doesn't qualify, even if you've been troubleshooting network issues for years.
Reason 2: Can't learn engineering skills in support
Support work is:
Following scripts
Ticket resolution
Escalating complex issues
Customer service
Engineering work is:
Design decisions
Implementation planning
Complex troubleshooting
Architecture
You can't develop engineering skills in a support role because you're not doing engineering work.
Reason 3: Support roles being eliminated
AI and automation are replacing entry-level support (see my previous post on the talent pipeline crisis). The roles that exist are dead-end positions, not development opportunities.
Reason 4: Hiring managers don't see the connection
"I see you have 3 years in network support and your CCNA. That's great but we need someone with network engineering experience."
But how do I get engineering experience if nobody will hire me for an engineering role?
"Not my problem to solve."
You're trapped.
Why This Trap Didn't Exist Before
2005-2015: The support-to-engineer path worked
Why it worked then:
Network support was real learning:
You actually troubleshot issues
Senior engineers mentored you
You participated in projects
Learned by osmosis
Internal promotion was common:
Companies developed talent internally
Demonstrate competence in support → promoted to junior engineer
Investment in people development
Market had more entry points:
More generalist roles
More willingness to hire potential over experience
Smaller applicant pools
2020-2026: The path is broken
Why it doesn't work now:
Support is commodified:
Scripted, not learning-focused
Outsourced or automated
No mentorship
No development path
Companies don't develop talent:
Hire experienced people externally
No internal promotion paths
Support and engineering are separate orgs
Market is specialized:
Fewer generalist roles
Higher experience requirements
Massive applicant pools (can be choosy)
The bridge that used to connect support to engineering has collapsed.
And people are stuck on the wrong side.
It's Not You. It's the System.
If you're stuck in network support with your CCNA wondering what you're doing wrong:
You're not doing anything wrong.
The system changed around you.
What Changed (Summary)
1. Certification became commodified
When everyone has CCNA, CCNA doesn't differentiate anyone.
2. Job requirements inflated
Entry-level roles now require years of experience + multiple skills beyond fundamentals.
3. Traditional entry paths closed
Support → Engineer progression broke down. Support roles being eliminated or outsourced.
4. Market specialized
Fewer generalist roles. More demand for specific tech stacks that CCNA doesn't cover.
5. Experience paradox intensified
Can't get experience without a job, can't get a job without experience, and traditional ways to get experience disappeared.
This Is Harder for Your Generation
I want to be very clear about this:
This is not a "kids today have it easy" situation.
It's the opposite.
Your generation has:
Better learning resources
More technical knowledge coming out of school/bootcamps
More certifications
Equal or greater work ethic
But you're facing:
Higher barriers to entry
Fewer entry-level opportunities
Broken traditional paths
Credential inflation requiring more for the same starting point
Competition from massive applicant pools
It's objectively harder to break into network engineering today than it was 15-20 years ago.
The resources to learn are better. The opportunity to apply that learning is worse.
This isn't failure on your part. It's systemic market shift.
What Actually Works Today: Practical Strategies
Given this reality, what can you actually do?
I can't fix the system but I can share what I'm seeing work for people who successfully break through:
Strategy 1: Build a Portfolio That Demonstrates Capability
The problem: No engineering experience on resume
The solution: Demonstrate engineering capability outside of job experience
What this looks like:
GitHub repository with:
Network automation scripts (Python, Ansible)
Infrastructure as Code examples (Terraform)
Documentation of home lab projects
Contributions to open-source networking tools
Home lab projects that show:
Complex topology implementation (not just basic CCNA lab)
Automation of network tasks
Integration with cloud platforms
Real-world problem solving
Blog or documentation showing:
Technical writing ability
Deep dives on networking concepts
Troubleshooting methodologies
Project walkthroughs
Why this works:
You're showing "I can do the work" even though you haven't done it professionally yet.
Hiring managers looking for potential over experience will notice this.
Strategy 2: Specialize Earlier Than Previous Generations Had To
The problem: Generalist CCNA skills don't match specialized job requirements
The solution: Pick a specialty and go deep
Specialization options:
Cloud networking:
AWS Certified Advanced Networking
Azure networking certifications
Build labs showing cloud network design
Learn Terraform/CloudFormation
Network automation:
Learn Python deeply (not just scripts)
Master Ansible for network automation
Understand CI/CD concepts
Contribute to automation projects
Security networking:
Security+ or similar
Firewall configuration (Palo Alto, Fortinet, Cisco)
Zero-trust networking concepts
Security architecture
SD-WAN:
Specific vendor training (Viptela/Catalyst, Meraki, VeloCloud)
Cloud-managed networking
Application-aware routing
Why this works:
Specialized roles have fewer qualified applicants. CCNA + deep specialty can get you in where CCNA alone can't.
Yes, this is different from the generalist path previous generations took. The market changed.
Strategy 3: Alternative Entry Points
The problem: Traditional support → engineer path is broken
The solution: Find entry points that still work
Paths that can work:
MSPs (Managed Service Providers):
More willing to hire less experienced people
Get exposure to diverse environments
Build experience faster (many clients vs. one internal network)
Can transition to enterprise after 1-2 years
Yes, MSPs are also changing, but they're still better entry points than enterprise support roles.
Vendor roles:
TAC (Technical Assistance Center) positions
Sales engineer roles (pre-sales technical)
Professional services
These value certifications more than enterprise hiring does
Contract/consulting:
Short-term contracts sometimes more willing to take chances
Build diverse experience quickly
Can lead to permanent roles
Internal company transfers:
Get hired in different IT role at company
Build relationships
Transfer to networking internally when opportunity arises
Easier to transfer within company than get hired externally
Cloud operations roles:
Entry point to cloud networking
Cloud platforms need networking knowledge
Can transition from cloud ops to cloud network engineer
Strategy 4: Network the Human Way
The problem: Applying to job postings goes into black hole
The solution: Relationships matter more than applications
What this means:
Local user groups:
Attend US NUG (usnug.com) or regional groups
Meet working network engineers
Learn what's actually happening in the field
Get referrals (this matters more than you think)
Online communities:
Participate in Reddit, Discord communities
Help others, build reputation
Make connections
Opportunities come through relationships
Mentorship programs:
Seek formal or informal mentors
Learn from their path
Get guidance on your approach
Potential job leads
Alumni networks:
If you went to college/bootcamp, leverage alumni
People help people from their school
Why this works:
Most jobs are filled through networks, not job postings.
Getting a referral from someone internal gets your resume actually reviewed instead of filtered by ATS.
This feels less meritocratic. But it's reality.
Strategy 5: Consider Geographic Flexibility
The harsh reality from the LinkedIn comment:
"Given how sparse and specialized the job market is here, I'm preparing to launch the next step in my career elsewhere, out of state."
Some markets are much harder than others.
If you're in a small market:
Fewer network engineering roles
More competition for available roles
Limited companies with networking teams
Harder to break in locally
Larger tech markets:
More opportunities
More companies with network teams
More entry points
More networking communities
Remote work:
Some companies hire remote junior engineers
Expands your market beyond local
Requires discipline and self-direction
Relocation might be necessary to break in. That's not fair, but it's reality for some markets.
Strategy 6: Bridge Roles Between Support and Engineering
The problem: Direct support → engineer jump is too big
The solution: Find intermediate roles
Bridge positions:
Network Operations (NetOps):
Between support and engineering
More hands-on than support
Less design than engineering
Can lead to engineering
Junior automation roles:
Easier entry than pure engineering
Teaches valuable automation skills
Can transition to network automation engineer
Implementation specialist:
Project-based implementation
Hands-on work
Builds experience
Can lead to engineering
These aren't always advertised. Sometimes you negotiate your way into them.
What Experienced Engineers and Managers Can Do
If you're established in your networking career, you have a role to play:
Create Opportunities for Entry
What I'm trying to do as a manager:
Hire for potential, train for skills:
Not every role needs 5 years experience
CCNA + hunger to learn + demonstrated initiative can be enough
Give people their first chance
Create mentorship opportunities:
Pair junior people with senior engineers
Actual mentorship, not just proximity
Develop people deliberately
Build progression paths:
Support → operations → engineering
Create stepping stones, not giant leaps
Promote from within when possible
Value demonstrated capability over resume:
Look at portfolios and projects
Care about what they can do, not just what they've done professionally
Be the Person Who Gave You Your First Chance
Someone gave you your first opportunity.
Someone took a chance on you when you didn't have all the experience listed on the job posting.
Be that person for someone else.
The industry needs this.
If everyone only hires experienced people, where does the next generation of experienced people come from?
The Industry Conversation We Need
This isn't just about individuals navigating a tough market.
There are systemic issues that need addressing:
For Certification Bodies (Cisco, etc.)
Questions to consider:
Are certifications measuring the right things for today's market?
Should there be experience-based validation, not just knowledge tests?
How do we differentiate between "passed the exam" and "can do the work"?
What's the role of certifications when everyone can pass them with better resources?
I don't have answers but these questions matter.
For Employers
Reality check needed:
Your job postings:
"Entry-level: 3-5 years experience required" is contradictory
Are your requirements realistic or wish lists?
Are you creating your own talent shortage with unrealistic expectations?
Your hiring practices:
If you only hire experienced people, where do experienced people come from?
Are you investing in talent development or just poaching from competitors?
Can you create apprenticeship/mentorship programs?
Your organizational structure:
Did you outsource all support roles and wonder why you have no internal talent pipeline?
Are you creating progression paths or dead-end positions?
For Educational Institutions
Questions to address:
Are bootcamps and programs preparing people for actual market needs?
Is CCNA curriculum sufficient for today's job market?
Should programs include automation, cloud, specialization from the start?
How do we create pathways from education to employment?
The Bigger Picture
This is connected to the broader talent pipeline crisis I've written about before:
AI is eliminating entry-level support roles (destroying the traditional path)
Job requirements are inflating (raising barriers to entry)
Certification is commodified (removing differentiators)
Organizations aren't developing talent internally (eliminating progression paths)
The result:
An industry heading toward a talent crisis in 5-10 years when senior engineers retire and there's no one developed to replace them.
Because we made it too hard for the next generation to break in.
The Bottom Line: It's Harder, and That's Not Your Fault
Here's what I want people struggling to break into network engineering to understand:
If you're stuck in network support with your CCNA, unable to get an engineering role, it's not because:
You're not working hard enough
You're not smart enough
Certifications are "easier now" so you're not as qualified
You chose the wrong career
It's because the system changed:
What made it easier to learn (abundant resources) made credentials less valuable (everyone has them).
What used to be the entry path (support → engineer) broke down (support roles eliminated/outsourced).
What used to be straightforward requirements (CCNA + 1-2 years) became unrealistic demands (CCNA + CCNP + automation + cloud + 3-5 years for "entry-level").
You're navigating a harder path than I did with different barriers.
When I struggled with CCNA:
Resources were limited (my barrier)
But the certification opened doors once I passed (my reward)
When you prepare for CCNA:
Resources are abundant (your advantage)
But the certification is table stakes, not a door-opener (your barrier)
Different challenges. Yours aren't easier - they're different.
Acknowledgment that this is hard and not your fault.
Practical strategies that can work in today's market.
Call for systemic change from those with power to change it.
If you're trying to break into network engineering right now:
Keep going. You're not failing. The game changed. Adapt your strategy, use the tactics that work today, and know that your struggle is real and valid.
And for those of us established in the field:
We have a responsibility to create opportunities for the next generation. To be the person who gave us our first chance. To fix the broken pathways instead of just complaining about "lack of qualified candidates."
Because if we don't, we're creating the talent crisis we'll be dealing with in 10 years.
And we'll have only ourselves to blame.
📧 Navigating your network engineering career in a challenging market? Subscribe to my monthly newsletter for practical perspectives on career development, breaking into engineering roles, and building skills that matter in today's market. Real talk, no BS. First Tuesday of every month. Sign up here
What's your certification and career journey been like? Are you experiencing this barrier between support and engineering? For experienced engineers: how did you break in, and are you creating opportunities for others? Share your story in the comments or connect with me on LinkedIn - this conversation affects all of us.
Disclaimer:The views and experiences shared in this blog are based on 25 years in the network engineering field and patterns observed across the industry. They do not represent any specific company, educational program, or individual's experience. Career paths and job markets vary significantly by region, specialty, and individual circumstances.

